
Let's take a quick look ... hmmm... fossil fuels ... as long as you burn them cleanly they produce water and CO2. CO2 is not a pollutant nor is water. All the panic is sheer balderdash. So except that we're going to run out sometime in the next thousand years or so (counting coal) the only fundamental problem is that as they become more scarce they become more expensive. Enter nuclear ... we should be investing in nuclear to find better designs and easier ways to contain or even eliminate nuclear waste. It's a stupid idea that nuclear is not clean and that the waste can't be eliminated. I'd much rather live next to a shielded nuclear source that's passivated than a container of potassium cyanide gas that isn't maintained. Solar may work out ... after all the sun runs the whole show. It's a good deal that it comes up each morning because if it didn't we'd be history in short order. The other thing to think about is how much energy you really need?
If we take advantage of all the communication technology we have we can reduce the consumption of many energy sources so that they last a lot longer. Everything is a trade off, but creating crises, especially phony ones is just a way to eliminated thinking so you can get people to do otherwise dumb things. Stop just reacting and start critically examining the claims before reacting. You're being manipulated.
HERE's AN INTERESTING YOUTUBE
I don't necessarily endorse the views in the video, but I think the skepticism about crises in general is healthy. All crises should receive serious debate and not be used as an excuse for rushing to judgment. AN EARLIER BRAMBLE
No comments:
Post a Comment