The question that has been bothering me ever since I heard that Barack Obama was going to run for the presidency is "Who is running him?" SEE HERE Why would I think something like that? Well the short answer is another question: When is the last time that a junior senator with almost no experience of any kind worth talking about ran for president? Not in my lifetime. This guy had done essentially nothing. He'd written two books about himself. I'm curious who wrote them and who bought them. It's not like he'd had some big achievement or other to support even one book. Go figure? Then he'd had a uninspired stint as an Illinois state senator where he avoided voting on anything controversial and as a result voted "present" a lot of times. What was that about?
I thought then and I think now that this guy is an empty suit. He talks well on script. He's great at repeating talking points. He's been a rabble rouser (ur community organizer) and is expert on Saul Alinsky radicalism. None of that sounds like presidential timber to me. David Horowitz turns out to think much the same as I do I gather. SEE THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE ARTICLE
Here's an excerpt:
With unseemly haste Obama has nearly bankrupted the federal government, amassing more debt in eight months than all his predecessors combined. He has appeased America’s enemies abroad and attacked America’s intelligence services at home. He has rushed forward with programs that require sweeping changes in the American economy and is now steamrolling a massive new health-care program that will give the government unprecedented control of its citizens.
Horowitz thinks billionaire George Soros may be the man behind the throne. He's certainly involved. The key to discovery is to connect the dots and find the threads that make what seems obscure emerge more clearly. What does seem obvious is that something sinister is going on. The conjunction of these crises focused on ramming destructive and intrusive programs with catastrophic side effects down our throats cannot be accidental. When a spider weaves a web, the sheer intricacy of the pattern may at first be disguised. But as the web grows the pattern becomes all too evident and the hapless are soon enough trapped snared and struggling to be fed upon at the leisure of the weavers.
Monday, September 14, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment