The picture is a Greenpeace publicity stunt (propaganda) but the story is about phony science and public policy pushed by climate alarmists claiming they are saving the planet. Mostly the only thing they are doing is enriching themselves and advancing a political and chilling statist agenda (might be really chilling too!)SEE HERE When you put data into a scientific report purely for its political impact you are no longer writing a scientific report. You are writing propaganda and taking an advocacy position. Knowing that that data isn't based on anything but speculation and still approving it means that you're a knowing party to the propaganda. This should have consequences to your status as a scientist, negative consequences. Scientists are not supposed to engage in propaganda to push policy agendas. They can do it in appropriate forums, but their science should be science and not agenda driven pap.
SEE EARLIER BRAMBLE
MEANWHILE MORE STUPIDITY
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment