An Example of Progressive Drivel

SEE HERE Drivel is empty rhetoric that takes a position without defending it.  This is an example.  There isn't any significant data in this but name calling.  There is also quite a lot of factual misrepresentation.  The whole bit about the Republican Party rejecting the declaration of independence and the Constitution as well as being anti-science is pure drivel because not only is it name calling but it false on the evidence.

Darwinism is a theory and it is a theory with parts and parts of it are clearly wrong.  If that's the best example of anti-science she can produce then that's pretty sad.  Now Herman Cain is a real mathematician who calculated orbits for a living.  I rather doubt that this lady could tell a differential equation from an algebraic one and probably can't do either.  The problem is that every one reading this lady's tripe is likely to actually think she knows something when in fact it is all empty rhetoric and name calling.   Drivel!  The global warming "consensus" isn't ... it isn't a consensus and it isn't true that significant global warming is even happening.  Get ready for a cold Winter.