As the Global Warming Alarmists' Case Falls Apart They Grow More and More Deperate

SEE HERE I can't help but think this is pretty funny. When a zoologist (George Monbiot) decides to take on Lord Monckton you just know it is going to be entertaining. Zoologists are simply not trained in anything worth talking about when it comes to climate science so the whole idea is just ludicrous. This document shows just how silly things can become. Most of the paper seems to be a rebuttal of John Abraham, a lecturer in fluid dynamics which is a mite closer to climate science than zoology. On the other hand the arguments seem mostly to center on style and not substance. Read it and see. The key to all scientific arguments is data. I don't know how often I have to repeat that. If you don't have the data then you simply don't have much of a case. The next level is equations and logic ... that might work if you get the equations right, interpret them correctly and do all the math and don't miss any important points. But then you need to show that data match the equations which is often difficult or impossible. None of the critics of Lord Monckton seem to both with mundane things like data. That makes the whole thing quite laughable.