This Would Be Hysterically Funny If It Were Not So Pathetic

SEE HERE So the science is just a narrative which got out of control? If that isn't a statement with an agenda driven context I don't know what is. There isn't any science that legitimately makes CO2 a very major climate driver. It's a bit player so far behind things like water vapor and the oceans that it can be largely ignored. The so-called science has been shows to be largely agenda driven bogus nonsense such as the hockey stick and cherry picked proxies to get the result they wanted and all the manipulation of the peer review process. The sad thing is that this is what can be expected all the time when government gets involved with science. Government publishes the result when it suits their agenda and they bury result that don't and stop funding the folks that got those "bad" results. Some of the scientists, those that have flexible morals, get the message and from there on out the science isn't science any more. One of the dead giveaways is the emphasis on modeling and the failure to do adequate validation of the models. Phony baloney as my dad used to say. Computer models are often, all too often, GIGO (Garbage In Gospel Out).

Meanwhile the fact of the matter is that the CO2 "greenhouse" effect is proving to be elusive. SEE THIS The most obvious question is whether in the face of this any CO2 driven greenhouse effect can be posited. Even the "lukewarmists" — those who say that there is a greenhouse effect but it is small, may be shown to be wrong. Now that would really be funny!