I thought in case you wanted to see what some of the folks that contributed to ICCC6 think about the Climate Science you might want to hit their sites so to make that easy here are a few:
GLOBAL WARMING FACTS This site is from the ICCC6 Heartland Institute
CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF CARBON DIOXIDE AND GLOBAL CHANGE You can get an over 800 page paper of peer reviewed science on global warming here responding to the IPCC report. The link for the report is HERE
CLIMATE SCIENCE COALITION OF AMERICA
CLIMATE DEPOT
WATTS UP WITH THAT
NATIONAL CENTER FOR POLICY ANALYSIS
The key to good science is data. So look for the data. Climate Skeptics without data are not any better than Climate Alarmists without data. When exposed to climate models the question is always one of validation. How are the models validated? How well are they shown to work outside the range of their initial validation data? The current climate models do a fair job of modeling their training data set and a rather lousy job outside the range of their data set. That's the test of whether a model is any good or not. I agree with Bill Gray. There's not much evidence that these are worth a damn and averaging the results of junk models is just an average junk model.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment