Here's a quote from a news story posted by World Net Daily, a follow up to a story I reported on last Wednesday : SEE HERE
The Department of Defense has allegedly compelled a private employer to fire a U.S. Army Reserve major from his civilian job after he had his military deployment orders revoked for arguing he should not be required to serve under a president who has not proven his eligibility for office.
Now that is unusual. I'm not sure what the real story is. The spin on the internet is that it's all a conspiracy by the Major's attorney. But it is stranger than that. This is the military we're talking about. On what grounds can they ask a private employer to fire someone? If the military revoked his orders and then ordered his CEO to fire him, where's the due process in that. There has to be more to this story than meets the eye. Again, why is this a story? What is it that makes the Obama birth certificate story have any traction at all? It's a birth certificate. Why is it still a story if there isn't a problem? I've read all the stuff. I've seen alleged short form birth certificates. I've seen the birth announcement in Hawaii newspapers. I've seen claims that the doctor who delivered him had conversations with folks — the doctor is dead now though. You would think this would not be a story any more even with nutjobs pushing it. In fact I thought that was the case and now the military is involved revoking orders and causing people to be fired. Just what is going on? Here's a video on the topic.
Saturday, July 18, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment