SEE HERE Here is a short excerpt of a paper by Brazilian Geologist Geraldo Luís Lino: (CHECK OUT PART 1)
... It is indeed regrettable that this sober advice has been deliberately overlooked by a good deal of the scientific community involved in the climate research and related themes (beginning with the Academy itself). Perhaps, in many cases this attitude has been motivated by the lure of the incentives offered by the AGW machine – plentiful research grants, mediatic exposition, prestige, the professional pride of making part of a branch of science elevated to stardom, business consulting opportunities and many others. On the other hand, besides the hundreds of billion dollars that have been wasted with the attempt of imposing a theory that is not supported by the physical world evidences, the “warmist” thrust is harming science in quite dangerous ways.
Science is always provisional. Science is not built on consensus but upon observation and conformance of observation with theory. The history of the AGW endeavor is one of cherry picking the data and agenda driven science in return for which generous grants have been forthcoming from the political arms of government bent on justifying all manner of regulations and taxes. It's not science. It's propaganda, and it's a damn shame. INTERESTED IN MORE?
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment