SEE HERE What is this editorial about except Richard Cohen's posturing as an arbiter of the truth. Quoting Michele Obama isn't necessary because she's on VIDEO and attacking Palin is just the current liberal mantra. So if you're a liberal and want to be part of the dialogue you reinvent the truth to suit yourself. It's what liberals do and then they scream at you if you beg to differ.
I think I can understand English and understand the tone of Michelle Obama's remarks without Richard Cohen's glosses. Sarah Palin unqualified? What qualifies Obama to be president? Being a community organizer in Chicago? Voting present well over a hundred times in the Illinois senate because he didn't want to be on record on any controversial issue? Writing two books before he'd ever done anything substantive? What qualifies Richard Cohen to make these judgments anyway? Being on the Washington Post since 1968? That's almost a sure sign that he's too liberal to be believed and too parochial to know how narrow he is, trapped in the Washington D.C. unreality zone too long to be objective. He needs to make an Iditarod. It'd make a man of him.
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment