The Myth of Green Energy

SEE HERE The problem is that TANSTAAFL (There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch) and wind energy is very expensive and also relatively limited. It is no less environmentally ugly than the cooling towers of nuclear reactors or the smoke stacks of coal fired power plants. What's "green" about wind? For that matter what's "non-green" about coal burning power plants? The coal burning power plants actually emit CO2 which is good for plants and promotes their growth. The whole "green thing" needs to be scrubbed of its major propaganda and reduced to some sort of fundamentals that are grounded in the truth. The truth is that more expensive doesn't mean "green." In fact the truth is that "green" is simply code for "politically correct." It doesn't really mean anything else.